<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll: Would you pay extra for IPv6 support?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/</link>
	<description>Beyond 32 bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Well, your poll isn&#039;t very clear.  Is it an IPv6 service that I&#039;m paying more for, or is it IPv6 support in system or software FOO, or?
I expect to pay less for IPv6 service --- less hassle, less complexity, no address space shortage... however, *ARIN* continues to charge essentially the same to ISPs for IPv6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, your poll isn&#8217;t very clear.  Is it an IPv6 service that I&#8217;m paying more for, or is it IPv6 support in system or software FOO, or?<br />
I expect to pay less for IPv6 service &#8212; less hassle, less complexity, no address space shortage&#8230; however, *ARIN* continues to charge essentially the same to ISPs for IPv6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-201</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d pay something reasonable like $5/month for it for the time being if it made the difference between it being available or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d pay something reasonable like $5/month for it for the time being if it made the difference between it being available or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-198</guid>
		<description>3 good reasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 good reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC John Sese Cuneta</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>JC John Sese Cuneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-197</guid>
		<description>No way I&#039;m going to pay for that.  We will be upgrading to IPv6 no matter what, so why should I pay extra for it?  If I don&#039;t pay for it, I won&#039;t get IPv6 support?  That means I won&#039;t have Internet access!

IPv6 = mandatory.  No IPv6 = No Internet access.  As Aris said above &quot;it is not an additional feature, lack of it is a defect&quot;.  ISPs who will offer that for an extra fee are obviously milking their customers.  End-users who will pay for it needs to be educated, seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way I&#8217;m going to pay for that.  We will be upgrading to IPv6 no matter what, so why should I pay extra for it?  If I don&#8217;t pay for it, I won&#8217;t get IPv6 support?  That means I won&#8217;t have Internet access!</p>
<p>IPv6 = mandatory.  No IPv6 = No Internet access.  As Aris said above &#8220;it is not an additional feature, lack of it is a defect&#8221;.  ISPs who will offer that for an extra fee are obviously milking their customers.  End-users who will pay for it needs to be educated, seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aris</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Aris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-196</guid>
		<description>No, because I already expect this from the whole package. IPv6 support is not an additional feature you pay for, instead lack of is a defect of the network connectivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, because I already expect this from the whole package. IPv6 support is not an additional feature you pay for, instead lack of is a defect of the network connectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivo-tje</title>
		<link>http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/06/28/new-poll-would-you-pay-extra-for-ipv6-support/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivo-tje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fix6.net/?p=70947#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Ofcourse not, we don&#039;t pay for v4, so we don&#039;t pay for v6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofcourse not, we don&#8217;t pay for v4, so we don&#8217;t pay for v6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: www.fix6.net @ 2012-02-09 05:49:22 -->
