New Poll: Would you pay extra for IPv6 support?
There is a new poll just on the right side of this post. The new Question i would like to ask you is.. Would you pay extra for IPv6 support? Be it for hardware or software. Perhaps vendor support or SLA options.
So tell me what you would do! The Other option can be used to vote blank, or you can comment here to explain.
Ofcourse not, we don’t pay for v4, so we don’t pay for v6.
No, because I already expect this from the whole package. IPv6 support is not an additional feature you pay for, instead lack of is a defect of the network connectivity.
No way I’m going to pay for that. We will be upgrading to IPv6 no matter what, so why should I pay extra for it? If I don’t pay for it, I won’t get IPv6 support? That means I won’t have Internet access!
IPv6 = mandatory. No IPv6 = No Internet access. As Aris said above “it is not an additional feature, lack of it is a defect”. ISPs who will offer that for an extra fee are obviously milking their customers. End-users who will pay for it needs to be educated, seriously.
3 good reasons…
I’d pay something reasonable like $5/month for it for the time being if it made the difference between it being available or not.
Well, your poll isn’t very clear. Is it an IPv6 service that I’m paying more for, or is it IPv6 support in system or software FOO, or?
I expect to pay less for IPv6 service — less hassle, less complexity, no address space shortage… however, *ARIN* continues to charge essentially the same to ISPs for IPv6.